![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small}
This is correct IF the labeling should match the graph before it in OkCupid's blog, on which it is based.
I based these percentage values on the colors of two of the other charts, which matched each other.
54- means 0-55.
64+ means 64-100 (I'm curious why they clipped these in the color values).
A value of, for example, 55.5 means that I didn't have enough data to tell if it was 55 or 56. Fortunately this only occurred in ranges of 1.
I based these percentage values on the colors of two of the other charts, which matched each other.
54- means 0-55.
64+ means 64-100 (I'm curious why they clipped these in the color values).
A value of, for example, 55.5 means that I didn't have enough data to tell if it was 55 or 56. Fortunately this only occurred in ranges of 1.
Also, the graph seems heavily biased against black males... They have the worst response rate of any race...
I don't know how much stock I can put in that... But maybe it's a demographic distortion from Cupid's membership... I'm not sure what Cupid's membership looks like...
Black women are more likely to respond to men of all races except for Native Americans responding to Others.
I'm real curious about the composition of Others.
Everyone is least likely to respond to blacks, including blacks, except Pacific Islanders.
Asians, Blacks, Indians, and Middle-Easterners are all least likely to respond to their own race.