If you are in a state that requires it, apply for a carry permit now, they can take months to process.
If you are only going to own one gun, this is probably a good place to start, because it is the kind that you can always have with you.
I HATE double action triggers (DAO, SA/DA, Glock), which are the type found in most hand guns. They have a much harder and longer trigger pull, for people who aren't capable of keeping their finger off the trigger until ready to fire, or remember to flip the safety off to shoot. Single action triggers (as in the 1911) are much better in every way, as long as you can keep your finger off the trigger, and practice flipping the safety off while drawing. I sleep with my 1911 in my hand. I have never had an Accidental Discharge.
Possibly useful: www.SmallestGuns.com.
The 1911 was named after the year in which it was adopted as the standard U.S. military sidearm. It is a thoroughly tested and proven design, and fires the very substantial .45ACP round. It also happens to be rather slim, and Compact (4" barrel) or Ultra-Compact (3" barrel) models can be very convenient to wear. It is also a single-action, which means that its trigger pull is much more responsive. The 3 largest manufacturers of 1911s are Kimber, Springfield Armory, and Colt. I've heard nothing good about Colt lately, and Kimber has the most modern machining processes.
A very compact gun shooting the decent 9mm, for a great price.
While the Kel-Tec P32 only fires the small .32ACP cartridge, it is extremely concealable. You will basically never have an excuse not to wear it. This makes it a "deep concealment" gun. You can also get a clip that attaches to the frame so you can wear it clipped inside the top of your pants, which looks like it's a folding knife. The extreme compactness of this gun is, in my opinion, the best excuse for a double-action trigger.
Any small frame 5 round .357 or .38 really. Fine rounds, and tiny. A shrouded hammer design makes more sense for concealment, but I cannot stand the way they look."The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." - Thomas Jefferson, third President of the United States
If purchasing a rifle for indoor use, consider shorter barrelled options (carbines) for maneuverability. This may reduce long range potential.
Do not buy a Century Arms (based) rifle, they are crap. They make copies of several of the below rifles (FAL, CETME, M14, AK-47).
I strongly recommend hunting with these in places where it is legal. Don't use them as an excuse to be sloppy, make every shot count.
Short: Buy a (metric) FAL.
If you want a semi-automatic rifle with a more powerful round than the AK / AR / M16, this is the section.

"The right arm of the free world."| + | Is more reliable. |
| + | Has greater range. |
| + | Does more damage per aimed shot. |
| = | Has equivalent accuracy. |
| - | Magazine contains 20 rounds instead of 30. |
| - | Is roughly two pounds heavier. |
| - | Ammunition is heavier. |
| - | Ammunition is larger. |
| - | Ammunition is more expensive. |
There are "metric" FALs and "inch" abominations, with parts incompatability and minor differences. Metric is probably the safe bet.
It looks like I will be putting a 1-4x scope on mine, using Leupold quick release low rings.
Buy a FAL instead.
Other than that, it is a copy of the HK91, possibly better than the original, a proven battle rifle.
The Spanish design HK started with when creating the G3/HK91. A good price compromise. Make sure you don't get one chambered for 7.62x51mm CETME, which can crack if you use .308 Win. / 7.62NATO in them.
Its fluted chamber damages brass to the extent the brass is not reloadable.
Because it uses roller delayed blowback instead of gas operation, it is possible to float the barrel for increased accuracy.
The M14 was the standard U.S. infantry issue Main Battle Rifle before the M16. The Springfield M1A is a copy of it. Comparisons between this an the FAL can be heated. Optics rail options are either partial, not covering the receiver, or require removing a couple bolts to field strip the rifle. Obviously irrelevant if you will only use iron sights.
Direct Impingement sucks.Short: Buy an AK-47.
These are the best examples of military rifles designed to fire larger numbers of intermediate (smaller than most rifles, larger than handgun) cartridges as a result of research which has shown that "...very few troops are mentally prepared to direct aimed fire at the enemy, preferring instead to spray bullets in the general direction of the enemy." - M16 History
An assault rifle is, by definition, fully automatic. I feel the additional price and paperwork are not worth the additional ability to waste ammunition. These models are semi-automatic.
Nothing beats the reliability of the AK-47.
It is one of the most common firearms in the world. It is stereotyped as inaccurate, but this is less true in current models. 30 round detachable magazines are commonly available, and the ammunition is cheap, roughly 25 cents per round in 1,000 round cases. Although milled receivers are more accurate by force of inertia, I would go with a stamped receiver for reduced weight.
I think the biggest flaw of the AK may be the short sight radius, reducing accuracy.
Direct Impingement sucks.A long range variation on the previous theme. A very precise bolt action rifle with a good scope. I suggest .308 Winchester caliber, because it is effective and common - also known as 7.62mm NATO, it is one of the major ammunition types used by the U.S. military. Effective range of about 800 yards. It is often recommended that you spend about as much money on your scope as you do on the rifle. Leupold makes good scopes. I recommend a 10x fixed power scope with a mil-dot reticle for range estimation.
Look around for a local shooting range over 300 yards. If they are hard to come by, consider the possibility that you will never have a practical need to make a shot over 300 yards, and consider giving up a little accuracy for capacity and getting a battle rifle instead.
With a .308 and a flat scope base, your maximum range will be limited by your scope adjustment range. To fix this, and for their quality, I recommend a Badger Ordnance 20MOA canted scope base and rings.
Savage Arms (under $300) is probably a good alternative brand if you don't want to pay for Remington.
Previously known as the Remington Police Sniper Special - it is one of the most accurate out of the box rifles in a reasonable price range. It is known to do less than 1" diameter groups at 100 yards without modification.
Pick something from the Liberty section.
I disagree with the common recommendation of a shotgun. If I had it to do over again, I would never buy a shotgun, and I would have another AK or more ammo instead.
An intermediate cartridge rifle carries 30 rounds, can quickly be reloaded, a carbine (short barrel) is at least as maneuverable indoors as a shotgun, and is far more versatile due to greatly extended effective range.
Shotguns generally max out at 8+1 rounds. Reloading is slow. "...the maximum effective range on a man size target with the 12ga buckshot is 18yds." - Shotgun Ammunition Assessment.
At typical (short) self defence ranges, if I could only fire one shot, I would prever it to be 12ga buckshot.
If you have nothing but paper walls between you and your closest neighbors, then you will probably want to consider over-penetration. In this case I would probably go with an extremely high capacity handgun with hollow points, like a Glock 9mm with a pair of 33 round magazines. If it's a compact, that Glock with its standard magazine can double for concealed carry. A very versatile option, but useless against an attacker's soft body armor.
Compared to an intermediate cartridge rifle or shotgun, handguns have an advantage in maneuverability and concealability. As mentioned above, there are some with 33 round magazines.
The Para-Ordnance P14.45 is a variant of the 1911. It uses the formidable .45ACP cartridge, and has a capacity of 14+1 rounds.
I cannot recommend a revolver for home defense. Even the 8 round .357s have insufficient capacity, and even with reloaders and practice I would expect them to take too long to reload, compared to a high capacity semi-auto.
You would be amazed how quickly six rounds goes away under pressure.
If you're going to get a revolver for home defense, go with an 8 round .357, get reloaders, and practice reloading. .44 magnum recoil takes too long to re-acquire your target, and the additional power is of no benefit (except the extremely rare case of some body armor). .357 Magnum has plenty excessive over-penetration and recoil.
This had to be listed, primarily to say what it is not. It is not the best of anything practical (in .357 magnum, .44 magnum, or .50 action express).Body armor is rarely used in crimes, but it is used, in contrast to .50BMG rifles, which have never been used in crime, but are outlawed in some places on the possibility that they could be used in a crime. Ridiculous.
All center fire rifle cartridges will penetrate all soft body armor. Some body armor has hard plates to stop a rifle round. One rifle round. One over the heart in the front, sometimes one on the back.
Clear face shields are not armor, and will not stop any bullet otherwise suited to self defense.
Shotguns will not penetrate body armor, but 12 gauge buckshot at close range is not likely to leave anyone standing or with bones intact.
Legs, arms, hands, and feet are almost never protected.
Comment on this page
Guns Index
SHTF equipment list
Best Toys Index
Main Index
Contact Darxus
Mon Nov 9 01:03:06 EST 2009